[caption id="attachment_932" align="alignnone" width="400" caption="Haruo Iida via Flickr.com"]

[/caption]
This post on Japanese aesthtics really reminded me of my backpacking trip through Japan. I dont think there is a more facinating country in the world. It also reminded me of all the things i'd stuffed into my head before I left for that trip,
in praise of shadows :
The essay consists of 16 sections that discuss traditional Japanese aesthetics in contrast with change. Comparisons of light with darkness are used to contrast Western and Asian cultures. The West, in its striving for progress, is presented as continuously searching for light and clarity, the subtle and subdued forms of oriental art and literature are seen by Tanizaki to represent an appreciation of shadow and subtlety. In places the work is strongly metaphorical. In addition to contrasting light and dark, Tanizaki further considers the layered tones of kinds of shadow and its power to reflect low sheen materials like gold embroidery, patina and cloudy crystals. In addition, he distinguishes between the values of gleam and shine.
The text presents personal reflections on topics as diverse as architecture and its fittings, crafts, finishes, jade, food, cosmetics and wabi-sabi (the art of impermanence). Tanizaki explores in close description the use of space in buildings, lacquerware by candlelight,[1] monastery toilets[2] and women in the dark of a brothel. The essay acts as "a classic description of the collision between the shadows of traditional Japanese interiors and the dazzling light of the modern age."
What a completely orginial perspective! Although I found myself being reminded of mirror encrusted
sheesh mihal (lit palace of mirrors) in lahore's mughal fort, a perhaps more overblown implementation of the idea :) Ditto the japanese gardens, and not merely their ineffable tranquillity and beauty but also the pains the designers took to make sure that it slowly unravelled like a yarn elegantly, gracefully and ever so subtly. and then you came to the centre (or wherever the main sitting area was) and you saw the small pieces now pulled together in a rich tapestry that you'd walked through but only appreciated on their own. and somehow having carefully been introduced to the parts, the sum of the whole was only greater.. and which is why a photo could never do it any justice, its never a point in time - its a tale and a story.
It also reminded me of when i nearly burn the skin off my legs playing with one of these
self heating bento boxes
Why does it seem like Japan is more attuned to the appreciation of beauty? Do the Japanese value the aesthetic component and experience more than other places? Are things in general better designed in Japan?
When coming back to Tokyo from abroad, my first impression usually is: What a dull airport! And yet it’s clean, neat and the floors deeply polished. To the Japanese eye, there’s a particular sense of beauty in the work of the cleaning staff. It’s in the craftman’s spirit — “shokunin kishitsu†— which applies to all Japanese professionals, be they street construction workers, electricians or cooks.
A Japanese cleaning team finds satisfaction in diligently doing its job. The better they do it the more satisfaction they get out of it.
The craftman’s spirit, I think, imbues people with a sense of beauty, as in elaboration, delicacy, care, simplicity (words I often use). Obviously, this also applies to bento-making and the pride people take in making them as beautiful as they can.
There is a similar craftman’s spirit (“shokunin kishitsu†or “shokunin katagiâ€) in Europe. Yet in Europe I can see it coming alive only from a certain level of sophistication. –In Japan, even ordinary jobs such as cleaning and cooking are filled with this craftman’s spirit. It is is common sense in Japan.
While Japanese are known for their particular aesthetic sense, I would say we also have an incapacity to see ugliness. How come?
We usually focus fully on what’s right in front of our eyes. We tend to ignore the horrible, especially if it is not an integral part of our personal perspective. We ignore that our cities are a chaotic mess, filled with ugly architecture and nasty signage. And so you have the situation where a Japanese worker will open a beautiful bento box in a stale conference room or on a horrendous, crowded sidewalk.
Are things in general better designed in Japan?
A central aesthetic principle in Japan is simplicity, but it is different from simplicity in the West. Let me explain the difference by comparing cooking knives. The knives made by the German company, Henckel, for example, are well crafted and easy to use because they are highly ergonomic. The thumb automatically finds its place when you grab the knife.
Japanese cooks who have special skills prefer knives without any ergonomic shape. A flat handle is not seen as raw or poorly crafted. On the contrary, its perfect plainness is meant to say, “You can use me whichever way suits your skills.†The Japanese knife adapts to the cook’s skill (not to the cook’s thumb). This is, in a nutshell, Japanese simplicity.
The knife’s simple shape is not seen as poor or raw. Beauty beyond fanciness is an aesthetic principle that is sleeping at the bottom of Japanese perception. A guiding principle also to Japanese high tech architecture and the minimal products of Muji.
Applied to the bento this simply means: Don’t try to be fancy; don’t overdo it. A beautiful bento is done using seasonal ingredients; it is done quickly and easily.
viaÂ
Beauty and the Bento Box - Room for Debate Blog - NYTimes.com.
& via
Kenya Hara On Japanese Aesthetics